UCR Research and Economic Development Newsletter: January 10, 2016
Michael Pazzani
Vice Chancellor for Research
and Economic Development
Back Issues of Newsletter: http://research.ucr.edu/vcr/newsletters.aspx
Grant Opportunity Search: http://pivot.cos.com
Sometimes,
little changes can have a big impact. Here are a few fairly minor
things I’d like to see changed about the UCR culture.
a. Grant Start Dates: Most federal agencies
strive to review proposals and make funding decisions in six months.
However, many faculty set grant start dates much longer than this.
For example, many faculty are advised by staff in their department to start an
NSF CAREER submitted in mid-July on July 1 of the following year. To date
this year, we have heard of three CAREER grants submitted less than five months
ago that will be funded. Using April 1 (or even January 1) as a start
date for a CAREER grant gives you access to funds earlier to travel,
purchase equipment and recruit graduate students and postdocs.
b. Proposals to companies: Unless
explicitly requested by a company, there is absolutely no UC or UCR reason
to provide a company with a detailed, itemized budget. Indeed, we
have recently signed several six figure contracts, and one 7 figure one,
without detailed budgets. While it is required that there be the same
overhead on corporate grants as federal ones such as NSF or NIH, unless
requested, the company doesn’t need to know the details of benefits, tuition,
etc. Many companies care about the bottom line
and it’s not necessary to give the same details as federal agencies (unless
they want them). Companies also are not like NIH. If you tell them only
direct costs, they’ll assume that is the entire budget.
c.
No
federal agency, company, foundation, market board (and likely no Dean, or Vice
Chancellors) provides you with funds to prevent one of your goals from
failing. Instead, proposals should explain to a funder how
providing you funds will make one of their goals succeed. Of course,
if you share that same goal with funder, your goal will succeed.
d.
UCR
subscribes to a service by COS PIVOT for searching for grant
opportunities. It also contains a feature to email you weekly with new opportunities
that match a profile you set up. See http://pivot.cos.com and use Save Search. I’d
like to see more people use the Save Search feature to alert them of new
opportunities. It takes 5 minutes to set up and might be worth a million
dollars.
NSF
TALK: Diane Okamuro- Program Director NSF Plant
Genome Research Project: Jan 14
Diane Okamuro-
The NSF program officer for the Plant Genome Research Project is
visiting UCR on Jan 14 and will give a talk at 1pm in the Campbell Lab, on the
first floor of the University Laboratory Building. http://campusmap.ucr.edu/imap/index.html?loc=ULB
Dr. Okamuro has given numerous talks on
NSF and funding including
Getting
Funding from the NSF: Strategies for Success: https://www.soils.org/files/membership/early-career/grantwriting-nsf.pdf
Research
Challenges and Resource Needs in Cyberinfrastructure & Bioinformatics: BIG
DATA in Plant Genomics: http://cra.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Okamuro.pdf
(and people who like Dr. Okamuro’s talk will also like our own Dr. Litt’s talk on Feb 4).
Amy Litt: NSF Bio
Workshop, Thurs., 2/4/16 at 11:00 in UOB 210
Amy Litt,
a professor in Botany and Plant Science and former NSF BIO program officer will
lead a workshop focusing on funding from the NSF BIO Directorate. Based
on her experience as a program director at NSF, she will give suggestions as to
how to craft a successful grant proposal to NSF. Although focusing on
BIO, there are similarities between NSF directorates and anyone interested in
NSF is welcome to attend.
NSF Day at Pasadena City College – Jan. 22
The National
Science Foundation (NSF) and Pasadena City College (PCC) will be holding an NSF
Day on Friday, Jan. 22, 2016 on the PCC campus in Pasadena, California.
NSF Days provide
basic insight and instruction on how to compete for NSF funding for science,
engineering and education research. This day-long workshop will provide
background on the Foundation, its mission, priorities, and budget.
During the day,
an overview on proposal writing, NSF's merit review process and funding
opportunities that fall within the seven scientific and engineering
directorates, as well as those that cross disciplinary boundaries will be
given.
Particular
attention will be paid to addressing the research and education needs of those
in community colleges. NSF representatives will be on hand to answer
questions and to host discipline and community college-specific breakout
sessions to personally engage in discussions with attendees.
Who: |
Early career
and tenure track faculty |
When: |
Friday, Jan.
22, 2016, 7:30 AM to 6:00 PM |
Where: |
Pasadena City
College, 1570 East Colorado Boulevard, Pasadena CA 91106 |
What: |
This 1-day NSF
Day workshop will teach researchers how to better compete for research dollars
that enable their projects. Information will be shared via lectures and
interactive sessions. This is a behind-the-scenes look at how NSF works and
how to submit fundable proposals. |
Register: |
Registration
and payment is a two-step process: First, register
on this page: http://www.nsf.gov/events/registrations_forms/index.do?cntn_id=137164 Next, submit the registration fee in the amount of $25, to be paid
immediately (as space is limited), but not later than close of business on Wednesday,
Jan. 19, 2016: https://10933.thankyou4caring.org/NSFconference This fee
includes a continental breakfast, lunch, snacks and parking. |
Questions: Send any inquiries to nsfday@nsf.gov. A draft agenda can be found
here: http://www.nsf.gov/events/event_summ.jsp?cntn_id=137164&org=NSF
Contacts
NSF
Days Info, nsfdays@nsf.gov
Lisa-Joy
Zgorski, lisajoy@nsf.gov
Research Infrastructure Discussion
At a recent meeting of chairs
and deans, and another of the Research and Economic Development advisory board,
there were some suggestions on how to easily improve the support at UCR for
collaboration and writing proposals. Here are a few of the
recommendations:
Some of these recommendations are being addressed to
varying degrees. Suggestions for improving them are welcome.
Suggestions
for improvements are always welcome.
(Top)
A faculty member
recently asked me to connect him with other researchers at UCR doing research
on diabetes. Here’s what I found using COS Pivot Profile search from http://pivot.cos.com/profiles/main
·
Frances Sladek: We use the whole
gamut of modern techniques -- molecular, cellular, biochemical, proteomic,
genomic, bioinformatics -- to investigate the role of the transcription factor
HNF4 in physiology and disease with particular emphasis on cancer and diabetes.
·
James Borneman Current projects
include examining the role of intestinal bacteria in (i) inflammatory bowel
disease (IBD), (ii) several types of cancer and, (iii) obesity and diabetes.
·
Maegen V. Dupper, Division of Clinical Sciences, School of
Medicine, University of California, Riverside. In 2012, while a fellow at Kaiser
Permanente Fontana, Dupper led the development of a diabetes
education and self-care management program to address the needs of the
region's large diabetic patient population.
·
Andrew
G Alexander, Division of
Clinical Sciences: Alexander's interests include diabetes,
obesity and weight loss, aging and anti-aging, and fibromyalgia and chronic
pain.
·
Megan
L Robbins, Psychology. Diabetes
Management using Online Social Networks
·
Masaru Rao. Development and application of novel
micro/nanofabrication methods and materials for microelectromechanical systems
(MEMS), microfluidics, and biomedical microdevices
MSE areas: novel materials, fabrication processes, and devices for biomedical
applications including cardiovascular intervention, diabetes management,
neuroprostheses, pulmonary drug delivery, and
cellular engineering.
Since most
profiles are automatically generated, it does take a little time to filter out
some without a recent obvious interest in diabetes and it probably misses
some. Of course, this is a good reason to update your profile. I’m
told some program officers, particularly in mission agencies such as DoD use COS Pivot to find potential faculty to fund.
Federal Roadmaps: NEH, USDA Plant Breeding, NOAA,
Public Access
Various Federal
Agencies produce reports, budgets and roadmaps that give insights into future
funding and programmatic directions, highlighting problems of importance to the
agencies. Studying these are a good way to get advanced information on
what funding programs will be created. Here are links to three recent
reports.
National Endowment for The
Humanities: http://www.neh.gov/files/neh_request_fy2016.pdf
USDA Plant Breeding: http://www.usda.gov/documents/usda-roadmap-plant-breeding.pdf
NOAA: http://nrc.noaa.gov/CouncilProducts/StrategicResearchGuidanceMemorandum.aspx
PNNL EMSL Call for FY2017 Proposals Is Now
Open
Late Last year, I
had the opportunity to tour Pacific Northwest National Laboratory with Matt
Barth and was impressed by many things including their user facilities that are
open to all researchers. EMSL or the William R. Wiley Environmental
Molecular Sciences Laboratory, is a national scientific user facility located
at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Richland, Washington. EMSL is
funded by the Department of Energy’s Office of Biological and Environmental
Research. EMSL provides experimental and computational resources to address the
environmental molecular science challenges facing DOE and the nation.
EMSL offers the
global scientific community a range of capabilities and expertise. Access to
EMSL’s capabilities is gained through a peer-reviewed proposal process. If a proposal
is accepted and the scientist publishes in the open literature, there typically
is no charge for using the EMSL instrumentation and capabilities. EMSL provides
proposal opportunities throughout the year.
This Call offers
two opportunities for proposed research projects:
Applicants may
apply for either or both, but should be aware of the differences in schedules
and respective due dates. Returning applicants are especially advised to
carefully review proposal package requirements as they may differ from last
year.
Award decisions
will be made by July 31, and approved proposals will be granted access to EMSL
resources beginning October 1, 2016.
Science Theme Proposals Accepted until February 29
Proposals for
Science Theme research may be submitted at any time via the User Portal (https://eus.emsl.pnl.gov/Portal) until February 29, 2016 at 11:00 p.m.
(Pacific Standard Time).
Researchers are
encouraged to submit proposals for molecular-scale research that address
specific selected topics in EMSL’s science themes to accelerate results in
emerging science areas of interest to EMSL, the Office of Biological and
Environmental Research and the Department of Energy. Details regarding this
year’s focused topics, as well as contact information and links to the review
criteria and proposal package guidance for this Call, are available at http://www.emsl.pnl.gov/emslweb/call-fy2017-proposals-science-theme-research.
Prospective users
are strongly encouraged to contact the relevant Science Theme Lead or Capability Lead well in advance of the deadline to
discuss proposal ideas and possible research collaborations with EMSL and PNNL
staff. Prospective users interested in coupling experimental and computational
approaches or developing novel computational modeling and informatics methods
that support research within the AAS, BDD, or TSE focused topics should contact
the Lead Scientist for
Multiscale Modeling and High-Performance Computing or the Capability Lead for MSC Scientific
Consulting.
JGI-EMSL Letters of Intent Accepted until April 4
This call is part
of the collaboration between user facilities that are stewarded by the
Department of Energy Office of Biological and Environmental Research. The
“Facilities Integrating Collaborations for User Science” (FICUS) program was
established to encourage and enable researchers to more easily integrate the
expertise and capabilities of multiple user facilities into their research. The
current call between EMSL and the DOE Joint Genome Institute (DOE JGI) begins
with Letters of Intent, which may be submitted at any time via the EMSL
User Portal (https://eus.emsl.pnl.gov/Portal) until April 4, 2016 at 11:00 p.m.
(Pacific Daylight Time).
This call
represents a unique opportunity for researchers to combine the power of genomics
at DOE JGI and molecular characterization at EMSL in one proposed research
project. Successful applications will focus on high risk/high payoff projects
in the focused topic areas that can be completed on an accelerated timeline as
compared to the standard CSP or science theme projects. In addition, they must
utilize a broad range of the capabilities of each facility and generate
datasets beyond what each of these facilities could generate by itself.
Applications
follow a proposal package guidance, schedule, and review process that is
tailored to meet both EMSL and DOE JGI requirements. Details regarding this
year’s focused topics, as well as contact information and links to the review
criteria and proposal package guidance at https://www.emsl.pnl.gov/emslweb/call-letters-intent-fy2017-jgi-emsl-collaborative-science.
Questions
regarding EMSL's user program or specifics about either of the Call
opportunities may be directed to the User Support Office (509-371-6003, emsl@pnnl.gov).
EMSL, the
Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, is a Department of Energy national
user facility that leads molecular-level discoveries that translate to
predictive understanding and accelerated solutions for national energy and
environmental challenges. We support BER’s mission to provide innovative
solutions to these challenges in areas such as atmospheric aerosols,
feedstocks, global carbon cycling, biogeochemistry, subsurface science, and
energy materials. EMSL helps scientists - its users - address challenges in a
wide range of research including synthesis, characterization, theory and
modeling, dynamic properties, and environmental testing.
DOE JGI, the
Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, is the only federally-funded
high-throughput genome sequencing and analysis facility dedicated to genomes of
non-medical microbes, microbial communities, plants, fungi and other targets
relevant to DOE missions in energy, climate, and environment.
Changes
to NSF Proposal Requirements
The National
Science Foundation (NSF) has issued the revised version of the NSF Proposal & Award Policies &
Procedures Guide
(PAPPG), (NSF 16-1). The new PAPPG will be effective for proposals
submitted, or due, on or after January 25, 2016. Significant changes
include, but are not limited, to:
·
Provision
of Collaborators and Other Affiliations information as a new single-copy
document, instead of as part of the Biographical Sketch;
·
Submission
of Biographical Sketches and Current and Pending Support separately for each
senior personnel, as it is no longer allowable for the current and pending
support of all senior personnel to be grouped together in a single PDF file;
·
Current
and Pending Support has been revised to reflect that all current project
support should be listed in this section of the proposal, including internal
funds allocated toward specific projects;
·
Format
of the Proposal has been revised to show that solicitations will no longer
specify different type size, margin, or spacing requirements. Instead, all
NSF funding opportunities will follow the formatting instructions contained in
Chapter II.B.2 of the GPG;
·
Chapter
II.C.2.b, Project Summary, has been modified to remind proposers that only
Project Summaries that use special characters may be uploaded in the
Supplementary Documents section. Such Project Summaries must contain separate
headings for Overview, Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts, otherwise, the
proposal will be returned without review;
·
Project
Description section has been updated to state that URLS must not be used in the
Project Description;
·
Results
from Prior NSF Support has been revised to reflect that the information must be
provided for any PI or co-PI that has received NSF funding with a start date in
the past five years (including any current funding and no-cost extensions).
Information has also been added on which types of NSF awards must be reported
on in this section of the proposal;
·
Enforcement
of 5 p.m. submitter’s local time across all NSF funding opportunities (thus,
failure to submit a UCR proposal by 05:00:00 PM P.S.T. will result in the
proposal not being accepted by NSF);
·
Electronic
signature and submission of notifications and requests by the AOR only;
·
Revision
of timeframe for submission of final project reports, project outcomes reports
and financial closure of awards to 120 days after the award end date;
·
Implementation
of NSF’s Public Access Policy;
·
NSF’s
implementation of the U.S. Government Policy for Institutional Oversight of
Life Sciences on Dual Use Research of Concern; and
For a brief
summary of these and other significant changes to the PAPPG 16-1, please see http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf16001/sigchanges.jsp. Given the number
of important revisions, NSF strongly encourages you to review the by-chapter
summary of changes provided in the Introduction section of the PAPPG.
Note: For
guidance on proposals submitted or due before January 25, 2016, and awards made
before January 25, 2016, continue to reference the PAPPG dated December 26, 2014.
Changes to NIH Proposal Requirements
The National
Institutes of Health have announced a number of changes to their proposal
policies. Some take effect for proposals submitted January 25, 2016, or
later. Others will take effect in May 2016.
The current NIH
Application Guide, released November 25, 2015, contains all of the current
changes. You can download it at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/424/index.htm. This should be the place where the May 2016 revisions are posted,
too, when they are available.
The notable
changes for research proposals starting in January 2016:
In May 2016,
changes will include new a new standard form to use in requesting assignment to
a specific institute and study section; new fonts allowed in proposals; and
some minor modifications to the biographical sketch. There will be new
requirements for the data tables in institutional training grant proposals (the
notorious T32).
Source: Mitch
Boretz (Thanks Mitch)
Mistakes Are Meant for Learning, Not Repeating – NIH Biosketch Compliance
On November 5, NIH started sending email
notifications to applicants indicating reviewers found one or more biosketches that did not comply with our current biosketch format (NOT-OD-15-032). Hundreds
of letters have already gone out. If you've received one of these
notifications, don't panic. These letters are currently just warnings and
require no action on your part. However, they do demonstrate NIH's commitment
to enforcing compliance with our biosketch policy.
What does it mean to have a
compliant biosketch?
eRA systems ensure some biosketch
rules are met by flagging errors upon submission. Applications that violate
these rules won't even move forward to NIH for consideration.
But, there are additional rules you
must follow to be compliant that aren't systematically caught by eRA systems.
Did you catch the part where I said
"reviewers found" the non-compliant biosketches?
We have provided instructions to our reviewers to flag any applications with biosketches that don't follow current guidelines. Don't
make extra work for your reviewer – give them a clean application without the
distraction of non-compliant formatting they have to write up.
Having trouble keeping up with NIH's
biosketch rules and getting your key personnel to
follow them? Encourage people participating on your application to use SciENcv (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sciencv/).
Not only does SciENcv help manage biosketch
information, it also creates perfectly compliant biosketches.
If you've received a warning letter,
learn from your mistakes and don't repeat them. Eventually, these warning
letters will be replaced with notifications that applications have been removed
from consideration. You've been warned (queue foreboding music in your head).
Source : NIH
Extramural News: http://nexus.od.nih.gov/all/author/nih-staff/
Funding Opportunity – University of California Global
Health Institute (UCGHI)
The University of California Global Health Institute (UCGHI) has announced
a funding opportunity (http://ucghi.universityofcalifornia.edu/funding-opportunities/2016-coe-competition.aspx) for new or existing Centers of
Expertise (COEs). The total award pool available is $400,000 per year, divided
between two COEs. The funding period will begin August 1, 2016.
Proposals may request up to three years of funding from UCGHI, but must meet
requirements, priorities, and criteria as stated in the full RFP (http://ucghi.universityofcalifornia.edu/docs/2016-coe-RFP.pdf).
Letters of Intent
(LOIs) (https://ucsf.co1.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_9YUodSasxx9OHDD&Q_JFE=0&Preview=Survey) to apply are due Friday, February 19,
2016. Full Proposals are due Friday, April 1, 2016. The LOI step is informative
only and not an elimination step. LOIs will be used to confirm
eligibility and for administrative purposes to establish the size and scope of
the review only.
Key Dates
Deadline to
Submit Letter of Intent (LOI)
Friday, 2/19/2016
@ 12:00 noon Pacific Time
Deadline to
Submit Full Proposal
Friday, 4/1/2016
@ 12:00 noon Pacific Time
Notification
of Outcomes
Friday, 5/27/2016
Funding Start
Date
Friday, 8/1/2016
Meyer Lemon
Recipe
This year, my Meyer Lemon tree has produced a large crop. Here’s
my favorite quick low-carb microwave gluten-free Paleo dessert adapted from http://www.rachelcooks.com/2013/03/01/meyer-lemon-mug-cake-low-carb-gluten-free-guest-post/
MEYER LEMON MUG CAKE
yield: 2 SERVINGS
prep time: 3 MINUTES
cook time: 2 MINUTES
total time: 5 MINUTES
INGREDIENTS:
DIRECTIONS:
Barn Owl
I was recently visiting Silicon Valley and had a hours\ between
meetings. I used ebird to see if there were any
nearby birds I hadn’t seen before and found there was barn hanging out in a
palm tree on the corner of Winslow St and Brewster Ave in Redwood City. I used Google street view to determine there
was only one palm tree in the area, so I stopped by and quickly found
it. It’s not a rare bird and they live in Riverside, but they are
more active at night and hard to find quickly in the day.
(click to enlarge)
There is a special significance to the next two birds, but I
won’t reveal it. A free Meyer lemon to the first person that
guesses. Both birds are found in Riverside but also other parts of the
country.
American Goldfinch
(click to enlarge)
Western Meadowlark
(click
to enlarge)
Michael Pazzani
Vice Chancellor for Research
and Economic Development
Professor, Computer Science
& Engineering
University of California,
Riverside
200 University Office
Building
Riverside, CA 92521
Assistant: Linda
Bejenaru
Email: VCREDadmin@ucr.edu