Michael Pazzani
Vice Chancellor for Research
and Economic Development
Back Issues of Newsletter: http://research.ucr.edu/vcr/newsletters.aspx
Grant Opportunity Search: http://pivot.cos.com
·
2017 Faculty
Networking Lunches: Australia,
Sustainability, and BRAIN
·
High
Performance Computing Center
·
W.M. Keck Foundation
Pre-proposal Information
·
CITRIS Seed Grants:
Cancellation
·
RATS
· Electrical Metering of Physics and Boyce
·
UC & OptumLabs Data Warehouse
(OLDW)
·
NSF Upcoming Due
Date: Social Psychology 1/17/17
·
NSF Upcoming Due
Date: Political Science 1/17/17
· NSF Upcoming Due Date: Cultural Anthropology Scholars Awards 1/17/17
·
NSF Upcoming
Due Date: Linguistics 1/17/17
·
NSF Upcoming Due
Date: Law & Social Sciences (LSS) 1/17/17
· NSF Upcoming Due Date: Developmental Sciences (DS) 1/17/17
·
NSF Upcoming Due
Date: Sociology 1/17/17
·
NSF Upcoming Due Date: Decision, Risk and Management
Sciences (DRMS) 1/18/17
·
NSF Upcoming Due Date: Economics 1/18/17
·
NSF Upcoming Due Date: Science of Learning (SL) 1/18/17
·
Transdisciplinary Research
in Principles of Data Science Phase I (TRIPODS) 1/19/17
·
Dear Colleague Letter: Data-Driven
Discovery Science in Chemistry (D3SC)
· Reminder Research and Economic Development Collaborative Seed Grant Program 1/12/17
·
Ring-Necked Duck
ί Scroll down, its worth it, I
promise
2017 Faculty
Networking Lunches
Announcing more faculty
networking lunches for 2017! Topics are:
Australia Day on 1/26/17 (register here: https://australia-lunch.eventbrite.com)
Sustainability Research
and Education on 1/30/17 (register
here: https://sustainability-lunch.eventbrite.com)
Neuroscience on 2/6/17 (register here: https://brain-lunch.eventbrite.com)
High Performance Computing on 2/13/17 (register here: https://high_performance_computing.eventbrite.com)
More to be announced
soon. The goal is get faculty with common interests to meet each other in
an informal setting and discuss possible collaborations.
January 26 is Australia
Day. Faculty from Australia are particularly encouraged to attend, or
those that have studied in or about Australia. Okay, Mark, well even
allow Kiwis. In 1993, I spent a sabbatical in Australia and really
enjoyed an Australia Day celebration on a small island on the great barrier
reef. Ive celebrated Australia day every year since although one year I
went to an Outback Steakhouse and they had never heard of it.
The food at our faculty
lunches is usually catered by a local Thai restaurant and includes vegetarian
and gluten-free options. Im going to try to get Aussie Pies for
Australia Day, and I may make a pavlova or a lamington. (If you want to attend
and can make a pavlova let me know
). Im heading to Australia for a
vacation over winter break but will return before the 26th.
All lunches are held in UOB
210 from 12:00pm 1:15pm. PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE AN IDEA FOR A
TOPIC that you think 10-15 other faculty will be interested in.
High Performance Computing
Center
UCR has for quite some time
had a computer cluster dedicated to bioinformatics. It has informally
been available to all disciplines and now we are formalizing its availability
to the entire campus. It will be renamed the High Performance Computing
Center (until someone can suggest a clever acronym).
Im pleased to announce that
Thomas Girke has agreed to be director of the
center. Please join Thomas for the lunch on Feb 13 (sign up above)
to discuss high performance computing general. In addition to our
system http://facility.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/resources/hardware
another goal is to facilitate the use of cloud computing at commercial service
and facilitate use of supercomputers such as those at UCSD and LBNL
W.M. Keck
Foundation Pre-proposal Information
The W.M. Keck
Foundation offers the opportunity to discuss potential projects with universities
before full proposals are submitted. The foundation allows each university to
submit one proposal each in the areas of medical research and
science/engineering research during each biannual cycle (see http://www.wmkeck.org/grant-programs/research/eligibility-and-priorities for details.)
Funding is
awarded for projects in Medical
Research as well as Science and Engineering Research.
A successful proposal:
An ideal target
as stated by Keck is $1 Million over three years. An abstract might
present a disruptive concept that was declined by a federal agency, with
reviews that indicate the research is extremely innovative, exciting and would have
a large impact, but is too risky due to the lack of preliminary data.
Some common
reasons why proposals are rejected by Keck:
·
The
project is not ambitious enough (i.e. represents only an incremental advance
over the state of the art vs. creating a new paradigm)
·
The
proposal does not fully detail the scope of work and potential impact
·
The
proposal does not list the reasons why Keck support is important (comments from
reviewers at federal agencies are strongly recommended)
·
The
project focuses on disease-related therapies or treatments (in the case of
medical research) as opposed to bench science.
An abstract of
less than one page will help focus the conversation and is needed by January 13 in advance of the phone counseling period which ends
February 15. Please do not submit
anything directly to the Keck Foundation. Interested faculty should
submit an internal preproposal following the below format at http://or.ucr.edu/ord/limitedsubmissions.aspx
by January 13, 2017.
Single-paged
concepts for the Research Program must be in 12 point Times New Roman font with 1
inch margins and should include:
If theres
room, the authors are free to add other details (e.g., background to put the
research into perspective, description of the institutions prominence in the
field, etc.). Avoid illustrations in these single-pagers the researchers will
need all the room for text. If a reference is necessary, abbreviate it as
(Science, 323, 45, 11). DO NOT USE (Jones et al., 2011).
Here is more
information from the Keck Foundations home page:
Supporting
pioneering discoveries in science, engineering and medicine has been our
mandate from the beginning. By funding the high-risk/high-impact work of
leading researchers, we are laying the groundwork for new paradigms,
technologies and discoveries that will save lives, provide innovative
solutions, and add to our understanding of the world. Both Senior and Early
Career investigators are encouraged to apply.
CITRIS Seed
Funding: Cancellation
In a prior newsletter, we
announced the availability of seed funds for faculty to collaborate with The
2017 CITRIS Seed Funding. CITRIS promotes collaboration on information
technology between Principal Investigators at UC Berkeley, UC Davis, UC Davis
Health System, UC Merced, and UC Santa Cruz. UCR had planned to enter
into this program, but due to funding constraints is not able to participate
this year.
Faculty are instead
encouraged to pursue collaboration with any campus through the MRPI program. http://www.ucop.edu/research-grants-program/programs/multi-campus-research-programs-and-initiatives.html
Ive recently become in
charge of Architects and Engineers and Facilities Services. I always
taken all my roles seriously from teaching to research and
administration. Ive heard that faculty dont like rodents and rodent
droppings. My wife tells me the same thing. We have an outdoor
rodent problem at my house and Im in charge of getting rid of rodents there.
At home, I eliminated putting
bird seed on the ground since food attracts rats. We also have some foxes
that help out, and I considered using foxes at UCR, but several people talked
me out of it.
See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rPV0BNvylM
for a video of this rodent encounter with a fox, but its not appropriate for
small children or rodent lovers.
I also use electronic traps
called Rat Zappers that electrocute rodents. I use peanut butter as bait,
but recently learned that Reeses peanut butter cups are also effective and
less messy than peanut butter.
Due to an increasing number
of occurrences, Facility Services is taking two immediate actions:
·
Effective
immediately pest management services are being increased. This is being
done to address the issue as well as protect you. Handling rodents (dead
or alive) can be a health hazard. In an effort to track and manage
accordingly for the campus, please have your department admin enter a work
order through the Facilities Work Order System. Facilities Services is
tracking and monitoring impacted locations and adjusting management practices
accordingly. For immediate/urgent pest control issue, including
disposal, please contact Facilities Services at 951-827-4219.
·
For
those who wish to take matters into their own hands, in indoor spaces, we have
made arrangements for you to be reimbursed for the purchase of traps.
Rat Zappers are available from Amazon or other places. See https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01KMNL896?psc=1
If you have a preferred trap, use that. For disposal
please contact Facilities Services at 951-827-4219 or Dierk
Biggs, Vivarium Manager, at 951-827-5580 or dierk.biggs@ucr.edu.
For reimbursement, contact Laura Manor laura.manor@ucr.edu (951) 827-4815. PLEASE DONT USE POISON; ITS NOT GOOD FOR
THE ECOCYSTEM
including foxes.
During the Winter Break,
staff from Facility Services are busy sprucing up University Lecture
Hall. The plan was put in place by Susan Marshburn
and her team.
Heres the complete plan
Clean and sanitize all seats
Extract all carpet
Paint the lobby entrance,
hallway and restrooms
Replace all the burned out
lights
Remove gum from the floor,
seats, and entry way
Cleaned and sanitize
trash/recycle cans
Remove all tape posting from
the entrance wall
Scrub and clean all concrete
/tiled floor
Repair ADA entrance door
Replace front entrance glass
panel
Remove cardboard trash cans
from the lobby
Clean and replace missing
wood paneling
Scrub and coat seal the wood
floor at the lecturer location
A special thanks to those
working so hard and quickly to address this important issue while classes are
not in session.
Electrical
Metering of Physics and Boyce
Many campus projects have been
slowed by the lack of information on electrical usage and capacity.
Thanks to a team in Facilities Services and a collaboration with CE-CERT this
was rectified on Dec 20. High quality Fluke 435 II recording meters were
installed at three transformers in Physics and one in Boyce.
I want to thank Sadrul Ula, the Physical Plant
leadership and Electrical Shop Supervisors for helping UCR achieve this at such
a short notice. Special thanks to UCR's only High Voltage
electrician, Brian Hambleton, who put in a long day and was successful in
putting them in with the help of CE-CERT staff and students, but without
requiring disruptive and time consuming electrical shutdown of the
buildings.
This is a great example of
success when UCR's facilities personnel, researchers and academics work
cooperatively together to solve a challenging problem.
UC & OptumLabs Data Warehouse
(OLDW)
As part of the strategic
partnership between UC and OptumLabs, UC researchers
will be provide 7 researchers with free access (aka:
research credits) to OptumLabs data warehouse. OptumLabs is an open, collaborative center for research and
innovation focused on improving patient care and value. The database includes
de-identified plan enrollment information, medical and pharmacy claims, and lab
results from multiple payers, all integrated across care settings and
longitudinally linked at the patient level.
UC will be soliciting
proposals for research ideas that leverage the OptumLabs
data. Examples of research projects using OptumLabs
data include: Variation in care, Utilization, Safety and efficacy, Predictive
modeling, Policy and incentives, Outcomes, Methods, Literature review, Health
economics, Guidelines/Quality of care, Epidemiology, Disparities, Delivery of
care, and Comparative effectiveness.
Dr. Tsotras,
from Computer Science, and Dr. Brown from SOM, have been selected as primary
UCR contacts to explore the OLDW.
Timeline (dates could vary slightly)
UC Review
·
Announce
Request for Proposals: January 9, 2017
·
One-page
research proposal form due February 2
o
Brief
overview of project, data required and resources available
·
Notification
of selected candidates by early March
OptumLabs Review
·
Full
Proposals will be due approximately 2-4 weeks post notification (mid to late
March)
·
Further
details on the timeline, process for the OptumLabs
review and data access will be described in the Jan 9 RFP announcement
Eligibility
·
All
UCR Principal Investigators (PI must be full time faculty at a UCR and eligible
to submit grants).
Stay up to date on the latest OptumLabs
opportunities and information by signing up for the OptumLabs
listserv: https://goo.gl/HoSLgh
NSF Upcoming Due Date: Social Psychology 1/17/17
Full Proposal Target Date: January
17, 2017
Program Guidelines: PD
98-1332
The Social
Psychology Program at NSF supports basic research on human social behavior, including
cultural differences and development over the life span.
Among the many
research topics supported are: attitude formation and change, social cognition,
personality processes, interpersonal relations and group processes, the self,
emotion, social comparison and social influence, and the psychophysiological
and neurophysiological bases of social behavior.
The scientific
merit of a proposal depends on four important factors: (1) The problems
investigated must be theoretically grounded. (2) The research should be based
on empirical observation or be subject to empirical validation. (3) The
research design must be appropriate to the questions asked. (4) The proposed
research must advance basic understanding of social behavior.
More at https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5712&WT.mc_id=USNSF_39&WT.mc_ev=click
NSF
Upcoming Due Date: Political
Science 1/17/17
Full Proposal
Target Date: January 17, 2017
Annually
Thereafter
Program
Guidelines: PD 98-1371
The Political
Science Program supports scientific research that advances knowledge and
understanding of citizenship, government, and politics. Research proposals are
expected to be theoretically motivated, conceptually precise, methodologically
rigorous, and empirically oriented. Substantive areas include, but are not
limited to, American government and politics, comparative government and
politics, international relations, political behavior, political economy, and
political institutions.
In recent
years, program awards have supported research projects on bargaining processes;
campaigns and elections, electoral choice, and electoral systems; citizen
support in emerging and established democracies; democratization, political
change, and regime transitions; domestic and international conflict;
international political economy; party activism; political psychology and
political tolerance. The Program also has supported research experiences for
undergraduate students and infrastructural activities, including methodological
innovations, in the discipline.
More at https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5418&WT.mc_id=USNSF_39&WT.mc_ev=click
NSF Upcoming
Due Date: Cultural
Anthropology Scholars Awards 1/17/17
Full Proposal Target Date: January
17, 2017
Program Guidelines: NSF
07-544
The National Science Foundation
announces an opportunity for methodological training by cultural
anthropologists who are active researchers. The purpose is to help cultural
anthropologists upgrade their methodological skills by learning a specific
analytical technique which will improve their research abilities.
More at https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5321&WT.mc_id=USNSF_39&WT.mc_ev=click
NSF
Upcoming Due Date: Linguistics
1/17/17
Full Proposal Target Date: January
17, 2017
Program Guidelines: PD
98-1311
The Linguistics
Program supports basic science in the domain of human language, encompassing
investigations of the grammatical properties of individual human languages, and
of natural language in general. Research areas include syntax, semantics,
morphology, phonetics, and phonology.
The program
encourages projects that are interdisciplinary in methodological or theoretical
perspective, and that address questions that cross disciplinary boundaries,
such as (but not limited to):
The Linguistics
Program does not make awards to support clinical research projects, nor does it
support work to develop or assess pedagogical methods or tools for language
instruction.
More at https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5408&WT.mc_id=USNSF_39&WT.mc_ev=click
NSF Upcoming
Due Date: Law &
Social Sciences (LSS) 1/17/17
Full Proposal Target Date: January
17, 2017
Dissertation Research,
Standard and Collaborative Research and Interdisciplinary Postdoctoral
Fellowships
Program Guidelines: NSF
15-514
The Law & Social
Sciences Program considers proposals that address social scientific studies of
law and law-like systems of rules. The Program is inherently
interdisciplinary and multi-methodological. Successful proposals describe
research that advances scientific theory and understanding of the connections
between law or legal processes and human behavior. Social scientific
studies of law often approach law as dynamic, made in multiple arenas, with the
participation of multiple actors. Fields of study include many
disciplines, and often address problems including though not limited to:
LSS provides the
following modes of support:
LSS also
participates in a number of specialized funding opportunities through NSFs
crosscutting and cross-directorate activities, including, for
example:
More at https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=504727&WT.mc_id=USNSF_39&WT.mc_ev=click
NSF Upcoming
Due Date: Developmental
Sciences (DS) 1/17/17
Full Proposal Target Date: January
17, 2017
Program Guidelines: PD
08-1698
DS supports
basic research that increases our understanding of cognitive, linguistic,
social, cultural, and biological processes related to human development across
the lifespan. Research supported by this program will add to our knowledge of
the underlying developmental processes that support social, cognitive, and
behavioral functioning, thereby illuminating ways for individuals to live
productive lives as members of society.
DS supports
research that addresses developmental processes within the domains of
cognitive, social, emotional, and motor development across the lifespan by
working with any appropriate populations for the topics of interest including
infants, children, adolescents, adults, and non-human animals. The program also
supports research investigating factors that affect developmental change
including family, peers, school, community, culture, media, physical, genetic,
and epigenetic influences. Additional priorities include research that:
incorporates multidisciplinary, multi-method, microgenetic,
and longitudinal approaches; develops new methods, models, and theories for
studying development; includes participants from a range of ethnicities,
socioeconomic backgrounds, and cultures; and integrates different processes
(e.g., memory, emotion, perception, cognition), levels of analysis (e.g.,
behavioral, social, neural), and time scales.
The budgets and
durations of supported projects vary widely and are greatly influenced by the
nature of the project. Investigators should focus on innovative, potentially
transformative research plans and then develop a budget to support those
activities, rather than starting with a budget number and working up to that
value.
While there are
no specific rules about budget limitations, a typical project funded through
the DS program is approximately 3 years in duration with a total cost budget,
including both direct and indirect costs, between $100,000 and $200,000 per
year. Interested applicants are urged to explore the NSF awards database for
the DS program to review examples of awards that have been made.
The DS program
also accepts proposals for workshops and small conferences. These typically
have total cost budgets, including direct and indirect costs, of approximately
$35,000.
In addition to
consulting the NSF awards database, it is often useful for interested
applicants to submit (via email) a summary of no more than one page so that the
Program Director can advise the investigator on the fit of the project for DS
prior to preparation of a full proposal. New Investigators are encouraged to
solicit assistance in the preparation of their project proposals via
consultation with senior researchers in their area, pre-submission review by
colleagues, and attendance at symposia and events at professional conferences
geared towards educating investigators seeking federal funding.
More at https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=8671&WT.mc_id=USNSF_39&WT.mc_ev=click
NSF
Upcoming Due Date: Sociology
1/17/17
Full Proposal Target Date: January
17, 2017
Regular Research
Program Guidelines: PD
98-1331
The
Sociology Program supports basic research on all forms of human social organization
-- societies, institutions, groups and demography -- and processes of
individual and institutional change. The Program encourages theoretically
focused empirical investigations aimed at improving the explanation of
fundamental social processes. Included is research on organizations and
organizational behavior, population dynamics, social movements, social groups,
labor force participation, stratification and mobility, family, social
networks, socialization, gender roles, and the sociology of science and
technology. The Program supports both original data collections and secondary
data analysis that use the full range of quantitative and qualitative
methodological tools. Theoretically grounded projects that offer methodological
innovations and improvements for data collection and analysis are also
welcomed. Click here for information on Strengthening
Qualitative Research through Methodological Innovation and Integration. The Sociology Program also funds doctoral dissertation
research to defray direct costs associated with conducting research, for
example, dataset acquisition, additional statistical or methodological
training, meeting with scholars associated with original datasets, and
fieldwork away from the student's home campus. See the Sociology Program Doctoral
Dissertation Improvement Awards Solicitation for more
information on this opportunity.
More at https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5369&WT.mc_id=USNSF_39&WT.mc_ev=click
Full Proposal Deadline Date: January
17, 2017
Program Guidelines: NSF
15-521
The National
Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES) of the National Science
Foundation (NSF) is one of the thirteen principal federal statistical agencies
within the United States. It is responsible for the collection,
acquisition, analysis, reporting and dissemination of objective, statistical
data related to the science and engineering enterprise in the United States and
other nations that is relevant and useful to practitioners, researchers,
policymakers and the public. NCSES uses this information to prepare a
number of statistical data reports as well as analytical reports including the
National Science Board's biennial report, Science and Engineering (S&E)
Indicators, and Women, Minorities and Persons with Disabilities in
Science and Engineering.
The Center
would like to enhance its efforts to support analytic and methodological
research in support of its surveys, and to engage in the education and training
of researchers in the use of large-scale nationally representative
datasets. NCSES welcomes efforts by the research community to use NCSES
data for research on the science and technology enterprise, to develop improved
survey methodologies for NCSES surveys, to create and improve indicators of
S&T activities and resources, and strengthen methodologies to analyze and
disseminate S&T statistical data. To that end, NCSES invites proposals for
individual or multi-investigator research projects, doctoral dissertation
improvement awards, workshops, experimental research, survey research and data
collection and dissemination projects under its program for Research on the
Science and Technology Enterprise: Statistics and Surveys.
More at https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5265&WT.mc_id=USNSF_39&WT.mc_ev=click
NSF Upcoming
Due Date: Decision, Risk and Management Sciences (DRMS) 1/18/17
Full Proposal Target Date: January
18, 2017
January 18, Annually Thereafter
Program Guidelines: PD
98-1321
The Decision,
Risk and Management Sciences program supports scientific research directed at
increasing the understanding and effectiveness of decision making by
individuals, groups, organizations, and society. Disciplinary and
interdisciplinary research, doctoral dissertation research improvement grants
(DDRIGs), and workshops are funded in the areas of judgment and decision
making; decision analysis and decision aids; risk analysis, perception, and
communication; societal and public policy decision making; management science
and organizational design. The program also supports small grants that are
time-critical (Rapid Response Research - RAPID) and small grants that are
high-risk and of a potentially transformative nature (EArly-Concept
Grants for Exploratory Research - EAGER). For detailed information concerning
these two types of grants, please review Chapter II.D of the NSF Grant Proposal Guide.
Funded research
must be grounded in theory and generalizable. Purely algorithmic management
science proposals should be submitted to the Service, Manufacturing and
Operations Research (SMOR) Program rather than to DRMS.
General Guidance
concerning the DRMS Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grants (DDRIGs)
funding opportunity includes the following:
More at https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5423&WT.mc_id=USNSF_39&WT.mc_ev=click
NSF Upcoming
Due Date: Economics 1/18/17
Full Proposal Target Date: January
18, 2017
Program Guidelines: PD
98-1320
The Economics
program supports research designed to improve the understanding of the
processes and institutions of the U.S. economy and of the world system of which
it is a part. This program also strengthens both empirical and theoretical
economic analysis as well as the methods for rigorous research on economic
behavior. It supports research in almost every area of economics, including
econometrics, economic history, environmental economics, finance, industrial
organization, international economics, labor economics, macroeconomics,
mathematical economics, and public finance.
The Economics
program welcomes proposals for individual or multi-investigator research
projects, doctoral dissertation improvement awards, conferences, workshops,
symposia, experimental research, data collection and dissemination, computer
equipment and other instrumentation, and research experience for
undergraduates. The program places a high priority on interdisciplinary
research. Investigators are encouraged to submit proposals of joint interest to
the Economics Program and other NSF programs and NSF initiative areas. The
program places a high priority on broadening participation and encourages
proposals from junior faculty, women, other underrepresented minorities,
Research Undergraduate Institutions, and EPSCoR
states.
The program
also funds conferences and interdisciplinary research that strengthens links
among economics and the other social and behavioral sciences as well as
mathematics and statistics.
The Doctoral
Dissertation Research Improvement Grants funding opportunity is designed to
improve the quality of dissertation research. DDRIG awards provide funds for
items not normally available through the student's university such as enabling
doctoral students to undertake significant data-gathering projects and to
conduct field research in settings away from their campus. DDRIGs do not
provide cost-of-living or other stipends or tuition. Outstanding DDRIG
proposals specify how the knowledge to be created advances economics science.
Proposals for
Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grants (DDRIGS) in Economics should
follow the directions for submissions in the Grant Proposal Guide (GPG). The
following bulleted items provide additional guidance concerning DDRIGs in
Economics:
More at https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5437&WT.mc_id=USNSF_39&WT.mc_ev=click
NSF Upcoming
Due Date: Science of
Learning (SL) 1/18/17
Full Proposal Deadline Date: January
18, 2017
Program Guidelines: PD
16-004Y
The Science of
Learning program supports potentially transformative basic research to advance
the science of learning. The goals of the SL Program are to develop basic
theoretical insights and fundamental knowledge about learning principles,
processes and constraints. Projects that are integrative and/or
interdisciplinary may be especially valuable in moving basic understanding of
learning forward but research with a single discipline or methodology is also
appropriate if it addresses basic scientific questions in learning.
The possibility of developing connections between proposed research and
specific scientific, technological, educational, and workforce challenges will
be considered as valuable broader impacts, but are not necessarily central to
the intellectual merit of proposed research. The program will support research
addressing learning in a wide range of domains at one or more levels of
analysis including: molecular/cellular mechanisms; brain systems; cognitive
affective, and behavioral processes; and social/cultural influences. The
program supports a variety of methods including: experiments, field studies,
surveys, secondary-data analyses, and modeling.
Examples of
general research questions within scope of the Science of Learning program
include:
·
How does learning transfer from one context to another or from
one domain to another? How is learning generalized from specific
experiences? What is the basis for robust learning that is resilient
against potential interference from new experiences? How is learning
consolidated and reconsolidated from transient experience to stable memory?
·
How does the structure of the learning environment impact rate
and efficacy of learning? For example, how do timing, content, learning
context, developmental time point and type of engagement (e.g., active
learning, group learning) impact learning processes and outcomes?
·
How can we integrate research findings and insights across
levels of analysis, relating understanding of cellular and molecular mechanisms
of learning in the neurons to circuit and systems-level computations of
learning in the brain, to cognitive, affective, social, and behavioral
processes of learning? What concepts, tools, or questions will provide the most
productive linkages of across levels of analysis?
·
How can insights from biological learners contribute and derive
new theoretic perspectives to computational learning systems, neuromorphic
engineering, materials science, and nanotechnology? Biological and
non-biological systems and social systems can all display learning. What can
integration across these different domains contribute to a general
understanding of learning?
More at https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5567&WT.mc_id=USNSF_39&WT.mc_ev=click
Transdisciplinary
Research in Principles of Data Science Phase I (TRIPODS) 1/19/17
Letter of Intent Window: January
19, 2017
This window is for Letters of
Intent. See Proposal Preparation and Submission Instructions below.
Program Guidelines: NSF
16-615
Transdisciplinary
Research In Principles Of Data Science (TRIPODS) aims to bring together the
statistics, mathematics, and theoretical computer science communities to
develop the theoretical foundations of data science through integrated research
and training activities. Phase I, described in this solicitation, will
support the development of small collaborative Institutes. Phase II (to
be described in an anticipated future solicitation, subject to availability of
funds) will support a smaller number of larger Institutes, selected from the
Phase I Institutes via a second competitive proposal process. All TRIPODS
Institutes must involve significant and integral participation by all three of
the aforementioned communities.
More at https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=505347&WT.mc_id=USNSF_39&WT.mc_ev=click
Dear
Colleague Letter: Data-Driven Discovery Science in Chemistry (D3SC)
Dear Colleagues:
The amount and variety of data generated in the chemical sciences, and the
rate at which it is being produced, are rapidly increasing, so there is a need
for corresponding growth in our ability to extract useful insight from
interrelated sources. A similar need is recognized across the National Science
Foundation (NSF). One example is the "Harnessing
the Data Revolution" component in the recently-released
document, 10 Big Ideas for
Future NSF Investment, which sets the goal of developing "a
cohesive, national-scale approach to research data infrastructure and a
21st-century workforce capable of working effectively with data".1 This creates an opportunity to enable the chemistry community to
effectively share, mine, and repurpose its rapidly-growing chemical datasets
and to apply state-of-the-art data analytics tools to expand chemical
understanding.
Through this Dear Colleague Letter (DCL), the Division of Chemistry (CHE)
invites submission of requests for supplements and EAGER (EArly-concept
Grants for Exploratory Research) and RAISE (Research Advanced by
Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering)2 proposals that seek to capitalize on the data revolution. Successful
proposals will emphasize what
new information can be obtained from better utilization of data (including data
from multiple laboratories, techniques, and/or chemical systems), and how this
can lead to new research directions. Proposals that foster and
strengthen interactions among chemists particularly experimentalists and data
scientists to advance research goals, are strongly encouraged. Examples of
possible projects include (but are not limited to) using tools of data
visualization, data mining, machine learning, or other data analytics to:
The most competitive proposals will address how the project conceptually
advances chemistry through data-enabled discovery science. Consideration of
error and uncertainty analysis, recording and storing of appropriate metadata,
and routes to determine the robustness and reliability of data are encouraged.
Note that the construction or maintenance of large-scale databases per se is not the focus of
this DCL, although such databases may be required as a means to the endpoint of
using the data to provide insights and predictions. Proposals focused on
developing cheminformatics for biomedical or materials research applications
are outside the scope of this DCL. Proposals whose primary focus is on the
development of general-purpose data mining or analysis algorithms not aimed at
addressing a specific chemical question are more appropriate for programs
supporting general tool development.3
One avenue of support will be through supplements to existing grants.
Supplemental funding requests must enhance existing projects by incorporating
or exploring the concepts described in this DCL. The upper limit of a
supplement request in response to this DCL is $60,000 for a maximum of twelve
months.
Other mechanisms for support of work in discovery science are through the
submission of EAGER4 and RAISE5 proposals. EAGER supports exploratory work in its early stages on
untested, but potentially transformative, research ideas or approaches. The
proposed work should be "high risk-high payoff". RAISE may also be
appropriate if the proposed activities are interdisciplinary and promise
transformational advances.
In all cases, Principal Investigators (PIs) are strongly encouraged to
contact the cognizant program officers6 prior to submission to determine the appropriateness of the work for
consideration. The proposal title must begin with "D3SC:". Each D3SC
proposal is expected to describe how the proposed activity will lead to better
utilization of existing chemistry datasets. For EAGER and RAISE proposals, the
title of the proposal should have "EAGER:" or "RAISE:"
specified, following the "D3SC:" designation. The PIs submitting
EAGER or RAISE proposals should consider the adaptiveness
and scalability as well as the broader relevance of the proposed activities to
other areas of chemical research. Proposals including international
collaboration are encouraged when those efforts enhance the merit of the
proposed work. NSF typically supports the costs of the U.S. team and foreign
partners are typically supported by their own funding agencies.
D3SC proposals and supplemental funding requests can be submitted at any
time but are encouraged by March
1, 2017, 5:00 pm, submitter's local time, in order to ensure
timely consideration. For proposals submitted on or after January 30, 2017, the
general proposal guidelines in the revised Proposal & Award Policies &
Procedures Guide (PAPPG) 17-17 as well as those outlined in this DCL apply. Normal review guidelines for
supplement, EAGER, and RAISE requests apply.
We are excited by the opportunities in the D3SC area and look forward to
working with the chemistry community to develop new approaches to gain insights
from existing data, as well as new experimental and theoretical results. For
general questions about this DCL, email the cognizant Program Officers in CHE
at ChemData@nsf.gov.
References
Research and Economic Development Collaborative Seed Grant
Program 1/12/17
The
Office of Research and Economic Development (RED) is pleased to announce the
continuation of the collaborative seed grant program. The grants are internal
funds for UCR faculty teams to collaborate and publish in advance of proposing
multi-investigator projects and centers to external agencies. Teams with seed
funding who generate preliminary results and gain experience working jointly
have proven more successful when they later compete for multi-investigator
and/or multidisciplinary grants.
PURPOSE
Serving
as a catalyst for UCR faculty to form new teams, the seed grant program is
intended to initiate new intellectual directions for faculty and to make UCR
more competitive for multidisciplinary grants. Selection criteria for seed
grants reward projects that create new relationships and synergies across
schools, departments or centers. Key considerations include whether the project
can be leveraged toward new externally-funded research, and whether the project
cannot be otherwise initiated using regular department or school resources. An
ideal project would apply for external funding within 6-10 months following
seed funding.
TYPES
OF AWARDS
ELIGIBILITY
Proposals
are invited from all UCR individuals eligible to serve as a Principal
Investigator. (For additional information on PI eligibility see Policy #527-3.) Although external
collaborations with universities or companies are encouraged, seed funded
projects must involve at least two UCR faculty (a PI and at least one UCR CoPI)
and funds may not be used to support outside institutions. A faculty member may
participate as PI or CoPI on only one seed grant. A faculty PI
on an award made through the Large or Small Collaborative Seed Grant Program in
2013, 2014, 2015 or 2016 cannot be a PI or CoPI on a seed grant in 2017, unless they
have been awarded a grant as a result of the prior seed grant or applied three
times for funding based on the seed grant.
USE
OF FUNDS
Funds
may be used for any activity directly related to the conduct of the research,
e.g. salaries and benefits for students, postdocs, or research scientists,
research supplies, equipment/facility recharge, etc. Funds may not be used for
faculty summer salaries, administrative staff, course buyouts, seminar
speakers, consultants, conferences, or travel, except to federal agencies or
proposer workshops. Small project seed grants will receive all funding at the
start of the project. Large project seed grants will receive 50% of funds to
initiate the project, with the remainder made available upon completion and
approval of a brief report on project status. All funds must be expended by the
end of the project period. To focus on projects that can make rapid progress,
unexpended funds will be returned.
DEADLINES
The
internal proposal deadline for both Large and Small Seed Grants is January 12,
2017.
PROGRESS
TRACKING AND REPORTING
Awardees
of Large Grants are required to submit both a brief interim report to release the
remaining 50% of the funds and a final project report within 60 days of the
award period end. Small Grant awardees are required only to submit a final
project report within 60 days. The final project report should include the
results of the research, a financial statement and plans or efforts underway to
obtain external funding. Lack of timely reporting may result in exclusion from
future award opportunities.
REVIEW
PROCESS
Proposals
will be reviewed by UCR faculty with comments returned to explain funding
decisions. The alignment of projects with the goals of innovation and high
impact, and the feasibility of completing the project and submitting a
collaborative grant proposal are evaluation priorities. Proposals that are
disruptive, use technology in new ways, or launch entirely novel approaches are
specifically encouraged. The assessment will consider the extent of
inter-disciplinary and inter-departmental collaboration as well as the
potential for subsequent extramural funding. Deans of the PI and co-PIs also
will be asked for input on the importance of the project for their school.
APPLICATION
FORMAT
Bearing
in mind that not all reviewers will have an extensive knowledge of their field
of inquiry, faculty should use proposal language accessible to the most
faculty. Both types of Seed Grant proposals use the same application format:
APPLICATION
SUBMISSION
Applications
should be submitted through the "EasyChair"
system at https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=csgp2017
Heres a photo of a ring-necked
duck from AgOps. The ring-necked duck is
distinguished from other similar ducks by the ring around its bill.
Although it has a bluish ring around the neck, its barely
noticeable.
Happy Holidays!!!!