UCR Research and Economic Development
Newsletter: October 8, 2017
Michael Pazzani
Vice Chancellor for Research and Economic Development
http://research.ucr.edu
Back Issues of Newsletter: http://research.ucr.edu/vcr/newsletters.aspx
Grant Opportunity Search: http://pivot.cos.com
·
Federal Research Funding 2016-17
· Total Research Funding Update
·
Top PIs in Federal Funding 2017
·
OSTP: FY 2019 Administration Research and
Development Budget Priorities
·
NSF Biological Sciences: Elimination of
Deadlines and Preliminary Proposals
Federal Research
Funding 2016-17
The
federal fiscal year ended on sept 30. below is a table
of federal funding each of the last four federal fiscal years.
UNIT |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
Bourns
College of Engineering |
$20,610,973 |
$24,336,493 |
$28,820,042 |
$27,323,682 |
Business
& Administrative Serv |
$619 |
$593,938 |
$366,732 |
$113,717 |
Coll of Hum, Arts
& Social Sci |
$2,130,918 |
$6,340,847 |
$6,152,524 |
$4,591,877 |
College
of Nat & Agr Sciences |
$46,731,794 |
$55,903,888 |
$54,387,706 |
$59,152,976 |
Graduate
Division |
$1,427,706 |
$1,987,983 |
$2,663,166 |
$42,755 |
Graduate
School of Education |
$744,754 |
$424,617 |
$2,682,354 |
$1,400,921 |
School
of Business Administrat |
-$216,896 |
|||
School
of Medicine |
$5,171,681 |
$7,732,563 |
$4,623,813 |
$4,551,193 |
School
of Public Policy |
$508,679 |
$938,910 |
$1,105,721 |
$150,000 |
Undergraduate
Education |
$75,000 |
$118,114 |
$257,611 |
|
University
Library |
$10,000 |
|||
Vice
Chancellor - Research |
$509,693 |
$215,546 |
$897,976 |
$7,642,159 |
Vice
Chancellor Student Affairs |
$1,061,898 |
$1,714,078 |
$1,533,989 |
$1,723,595 |
Grand
Total |
$78,756,819 |
$100,198,863 |
$103,352,137 |
$106,950,486 |
UC
compiles funding statistics of each campus. UCR has grown by the largest
percentage in funding from all sources. The graph below compares UCR to
our closets UC peers in funding. We have surpassed Santa Cruz and are
closing in on Santa Barbara.
Top PIs in
Federal Funding 2017
The table below shows the funding of PIs whose total federal
funding exceed $750,000 last year and the number of awards contributing to this
total. Grants awarded to these 34 faculty and their collaborators account
for a little more than half of UCRs federal funding. Of particular
note are the assistant professors in the list who are off to a great
start.
Of course, the importance of all research and its impact can’t simply be measured in dollars. A $5000 grant to
support an undergraduate conducting research can have a life changing
impact. The “long tail” is as important as the top to being a
comprehensive research university. A total of 255
faculty are PIs of federal grants. As is apparent from the next section,
the federal government doesn’t value all research
areas as much as UCR does.
PI |
College |
Count |
Total |
Roper, Caroline |
CNAS |
4 |
$5,566,963 |
Akbari, Omar |
CNAS |
4 |
$4,551,754 |
Atkinson, Peter |
CNAS |
2 |
$3,839,536 |
Shi, Jing |
CNAS |
2 |
$3,130,000 |
Barth, Matthew J |
BCOE |
5 |
$3,097,396 |
Mohsenian-Rad, Amir Hamed |
BCOE |
4 |
$2,737,309 |
Reynolds, Chandra A |
CHASS |
7 |
$1,655,378 |
Velazquez, Alicia |
Student Affairs |
11 |
$1,653,733 |
Kisailus, David |
BCOE |
5 |
$1,580,520 |
Lyons, Timothy W |
CNAS |
4 |
$1,492,900 |
Vidalakis, Georgios |
CNAS |
4 |
$1,443,656 |
Close, Timothy J |
CNAS |
3 |
$1,323,699 |
Mobasher, Bahram |
CNAS |
9 |
$1,301,711 |
Brisk, Philip |
BCOE |
10 |
$1,293,319 |
Roy Chowdhury, Amit K |
BCOE |
4 |
$1,190,000 |
Pazzani, Michael |
RED |
3 |
$1,179,393 |
Cybart, Shane |
BCOE |
7 |
$1,178,062 |
Rasmussen, Carolyn |
CNAS |
2 |
$1,120,309 |
Talbot, Prue |
CNAS |
3 |
$1,006,877 |
Zhong, Wenwan |
CNAS |
7 |
$997,635 |
Wang, Yinsheng |
CNAS |
4 |
$980,071 |
Bailey-Serres, Julia |
CNAS |
4 |
$961,808 |
Wheeldon, Ian |
BCOE |
6 |
$938,790 |
Seitz, Aaron |
CHASS |
4 |
$916,203 |
Tsutsui, Hideaki |
BCOE |
3 |
$907,104 |
Gill, Sarjeet S |
CNAS |
2 |
$897,154 |
Sachs, Joel Lawrence |
CNAS |
1 |
$892,835 |
Wimpenny, Stephen |
CNAS |
2 |
$870,000 |
Nelson, David |
CNAS |
6 |
$805,410 |
Yin, Heng |
BCOE |
6 |
$798,495 |
Jenerette, Darrel |
CNAS |
7 |
$790,879 |
Christopher, Phillip |
BCOE |
4 |
$775,000 |
Roberts, Philip A |
CNAS |
6 |
$757,533 |
Abdulrazak, Khaleel |
CHASS |
3 |
$750,991 |
OSTP: FY 2019
Administration Research and Development Budget Priorities
The Office of Science and Technology Policy is part of the
executive branch of government. Most years, they release priorities for federal
research agencies. Although there is currently lack of agreement
between congress and the president on many matters, at the highest level of
abstraction, there is strong rhetorical support for R&D
funding. Of note, there is priority for early stage and basic
research over applied research. Nonetheless, R&D in support of
Military and Security are called out in addition to
health. STEM education and Research Infrastructure area called out.
The full report is available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/ostp/fy2019-administration-research-development-budget-priorities.pdf
Some excerpts are below:
American Military Superiority
The American warfighter requires state-of-the-art tools and technologies to defeat a growing number of emerging threats. Agencies should invest· in R&D that can support the military of the future, including in technologies related to the development of missile defense capabilities, a modern strategic deterrent, hypersonic weapons and defenses, autonomous and space-based systems, trusted microelectronics, and future computing capabilities. …
American Security
The security of Americans at home and abroad is paramount. Emerging threats against the American homeland compel the Federal Government to develop the technologies necessary to prevent terrorist attacks, mitigate the effects of both natural and adversarial threats and hazards, and secure American borders. Agencies should invest in R&D to increase the security and resilience of the Nation’s critical infrastructure from both physical threats and cyber-attacks, which have increased rapidly in number and complexity in recent years. …. Special attention should be paid to R&D that can support the safe and secure integration into society of new technologies that have the potential to contribute significantly to American economic and technological leadership.
American Energy Dominance
A consistent, long-term supply of lower-cost American energy will provide security through energy independence and help create a stable supply of high-paying jobs, while lower prices for electricity and fuel will spur American prosperity. Development of domestic energy sources should be the basis for a clean energy portfolio composed of fossil, nuclear, and renewable energy sources. Agencies should invest in early-stage, innovative technologies that show promise in harnessing American energy resources safely and efficiently. As initiated in the FY 2018 budget, Federally-funded energy R&D should continue to reflect an increased reliance on the private sector to fund later-stage research, development, and commercialization of energy technologies.
American Health
R&D investments in
health-related fields both lengthen and improve the quality of American lives.
As part of the Administration’s commitment to improving health outcomes while
lowering healthcare costs, agencies should give priority to biomedical programs
that encourage innovation to prevent, treat, and defeat diseases, and maintain
America’s standing as a world leader in medicine. Agencies should prioritize
R&D focused on solutions for an aging population, as well as on combating drug
addiction and other public health crises. Alongside foundational biological
research, agencies should support investments that develop tools and
technologies with the potential to open new areas of discovery. In particular,
agencies should prioritize R&D efforts that will lead to more efficient and
effective healthcare.
Supporting Innovative Early-Stage
Research Basic and early-stage applied research are critical components of the American research enterprise and the basis of new technological development and commercialization. However, in the development of high-payoff technology, early-stage research often involves greater uncertainty and may not provide the economic incentive needed to attract private sector investment. Therefore, agencies should give priority to funding basic and early-stage applied research that, supplemented by private sector financing of later-stage R&D, can result in the development of transformative commercial products and services.
Developing a Future-Focused Workforce
The Administration is committed to
improving the technical training of the American workforce through Science,
Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) education and apprenticeships.
Emerging technologies will present tremendous opportunities for new job creation,
but will also require a technically skilled and capable workforce to meet
demand. In order to maintain American competitiveness and help ensure that the
domestic workforce is available and qualified for the jobs of the future,
agencies should incorporate STEM education, including computer science
education, and workforce training opportunities into their programs.
Modernizing and Managing Research Infrastructure
State-of-the-art research infrastructure provides the United States with unique capabilities, ensuring that the American science and technology workforce has the capabilities it needs to conduct world-leading research. Maintaining and modernizing research infrastructure is critical to getting the best value out of R&D investments. Innovative partnership models involving other agencies, state and local governments, the private sector, academia, and international partners can help maximize utilization of underused facilities and lead to sharing the costs of new R&D facilities
NSF Biological Sciences: Elimination of
Deadlines and Preliminary Proposals
The
Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO) is notifying members of the research
communities of important changes to the core program solicitations as noted
below, effective in calendar year 2018.
In order to promote interdisciplinary research that crosses
biological scales and traverses current divisional boundaries, BIO will
implement a "no-deadline," full-proposal mechanism for receiving and
reviewing proposals submitted to core programs in the Division of Environmental
Biology (DEB), the Division of Integrative Organismal Systems (IOS), the
Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences (MCB), and to the programs in
the Research Resources Cluster of the Division of Biological Infrastructure
(DBI).
By
accepting proposals at any time, investigators will have greater opportunities
to prepare their proposals, build strong collaborations, and think more
creatively, thereby resulting in more complex, interdisciplinary projects that
have the potential to dramatically advance biological
science. We anticipate that the elimination of deadlines will reduce the burden
on institutions and the community by expanding the submission period over the
course of the year, in contrast to the previous fixed yearly deadlines.
For these
changes to take effect, the core programs in DEB and IOS are discontinuing use
of the preliminary proposal mechanism in 2018. There will be no call
for preliminary proposals in January 2018.
More details are available at
https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2018/nsf18011/nsf18011.jsp?WT.mc_id=USNSF_25&WT.mc_ev=click
UAV Lunch: Oct 23
Research and Economic Development hosts lunches to get together faculty from different
colleges working on related problems.
We'll host a lunch on Oct 23
starting at noon in UOB 210 with the topic of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs or drones) in research and education. If interested,
please sign up at.
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/research-lunch-tickets-37958335403
The lunches are catered
by a local Thai restaurant and include vegetarian and gluten-free options.
If you have an idea for a topic, please notify
me. (We are planning a lunch for autism researchers and another for
computational modeling and simulation)
Cannabis Potluck: Oct 11
We'll host a lunch on Oct 11
starting at noon in UOB 210 with the topic of Cannabis Research.
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/research-lunch-on-cannibis-tickets-38440409299
The
goal is to connect researchers who are conducting academic research on cannabis
and users of cannabis. Topics may include but are not limited to
·
Agricultural
Research: Plan Breeding, Horticulture, Plant Pathology, Pesticides, etc.
·
Research
on purity and chemical composition of cannabis products available to consumers
·
Biomedical
research on cannabis and related compounds.
·
Social
Science and public policy research on cannabis and its users
See
https://www.drugabuse.gov/drugs-abuse/marijuana for some info on NIH and cannibis
There
is likely to be a UC completive grant program funded by a tax on cannabis next
year.
It’s not really a potluck.
It will be catered by a local Thai restaurant and include vegetarian and
gluten-free options. However, you may bring dessert. I’ll
be baking brownies.
I recently attended a workshop in Melbourne on Explainable
Artificial Intelligence. I had some free time to find nearby bird
life. Here’s a photo of a black swan with a baby
swan on its back. I’ve never seen a baby
bird hitching a ride, although in the US grebes and loons do this.